Latest pages: http://www.therealmartha.com/WAR/index.htm
The Whispering Activist Record - Opinions and ideas,
mine and from others, that everyone can use to get involved, make a difference and lighten
the load. Find hoax busters, media hype alerts, timely info, controversy, common sense,
commiseration, empathy, household tips, easy recipes, critter stuff, variety links, and a
little humor along the way.

Send your email to let the President know he has your support!
president@whitehouse.gov
Find other government links below. You will most likely receive a form reply. That's OK, don't be surprised or disappointed, the numbers do count.
The N E W S
Never Ever Watch Stupefied

If nothing else on this page sticks ...
Do your best to remember not to believe everything you hear or read. Bottom line: bad news sells. Reporters and broadcasters exaggerate and/or make up "facts" as they see fit.
Key word: Fit space available - in print or to fill a time slot - no "honesty oath" required. All media fight constant deadline battles, something has to go out, on paper or over the air. Hard to tell which is worse, only part of the story or more than anyone wants or needs to know. It happens every day, no regrets, possibly the rare apology, only as a face-save after the sh*t hits the fan. It will hit, who cares? Not many, sorry, that's the way it is.
Editors, publishers, hosts, writers, anchor people and formats come in all shapes and sizes. Know before you trust and don't be surprised if you have a nasty slap in the face coming down the road. Above all, don't take quotes for granted. Before I ended up on the other end of the note pad, it was quite astonishing to read what I'd "said." OK, must have been one of my other personalities ... 'fraid not, it was exactly whatever, whoever felt like writing, often causing real problems, depending on the subject. Therefore, when it was my turn, I took great care with quotes. That still didn't stop someone down the line from screwing up. The papers I worked for were small. I did have a certain amount of control, still, mistakes were made.The World War II slogan, "Loose lips sink ships," keeps coming to mind. "Think before believe/circulate," would be most apropos today. The 'net is an especially powerful, potentially dangerous outlet. Please use it wisely.
I am still sitting on a pile of mail, 95 percent of which I might just delete. On previous pages I have asked for clearly subject lines. "You have to see this," "Interesting," "Wow," and so on, ad nauseum, tell me zip.
"Have you seen this?" Yes, I probably have. In whose opinion do I have to see this? Why is it interesting? Wow what? I am not a quitter, I am for damn sure going to quit wasting my time though. I do appreciate everyone's effort - let's try to work together on this ...
When sending a link, please use the URL in the subject line. If I don't recognize it, I will open the mail. If you have included a brief review, I will most likely add both to the next page. I simply do not have time to check out every link that comes my way. More to the point, I have no interest in certain types of links. Snotty though that may sound, it doesn't mean I won't use your suggestion - I have no idea or the right to judge what anybody else may want to see. One more time, I do thank those who are contributing. All input is welcome, the easiest to identify and sort are on top of the pile. If you don't see yours soon, send again (mark as back up please). It may have been lost a number of ways or I'm holding for a specific page. If you sent a piece that appears with another credit, it means that one arrived first.
I do not necessarily need a source identified, nor do I feel obligated to credit any source on individual text pieces. Various media sites are taking care of the "important" authors, and the hoax sites seem to be staying on top of all that mess. Please check at least a few before sending me the latest "gem." I will use snippets I find worth highlighting from any source, however, I am more interested in the unknown (as in not well known) opinions. Wisdom is out there, be it "qualified" or not, Suzy Q's or your old weird Uncle Harold's. Or yours, and, if using your own name could be a financial risk (as in business/losing your job), pen names are acceptable. I need to know who you are or who vouches for you - that's all.
He who knows little, quickly tells it. - unknown
We are born with two ears and one mouth, best to use each accordingly (An oldie, slightly reworded.).
A sharp tongue and a dull mind are usually found in the same head. (see below)"The fact that you are willing to say, ''I do not understand, and it is fine,'' is the greatest understanding you could exhibit." - Wayne Dyer
All of the above apply to most of the "wisdom" and "answers" coming in like so much flak. It does not matter who or what is to blame for our vulnerability and collective wound. Pointing the finger accomplishes nothing but discord. It is time to move on. Get behind the President - or get out of the way.
If I hear one more "We asked for it," in reference to foreign aid, I will puke.
The lesson to be learned is obvious, we can't save the world from itself. Let's try taking care of our own first for a change. Hell yes, there's a lot wrong with any government program you can name. My Pollyanna voice says, OK, we'll get all that fixed next. In the meantime, quit wasting time bitching. Get involved with a positive effort.
A
pacific people will naturally insure
a pacific government, so long as it shall be elective,
and a contentious people will be pretty sure
to produce a contentious government
or to give a contentious aspect and direction.
Rhode Island Almanack, 1823

How about a little good news for a change?
Now is a time to look at the other side of the numbers coming out of New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. The sad but somewhat uplifting side that the mainstream media has not reported yet - the survival rates and some positive news about the attacks. The World Trade Center - The twin towers of the World Trade Center were places of employment for some 50,000 people. With the missing list of more than 5,000 people, that still means approximately 90 percent targeted survived the attack. On a test, 90 percent is an 'A'.The Pentagon - Some 23,000 were targets of the third plane. The latest count shows 123 lost their lives, an amazing 99.5 percent survival rate. In addition, the plane seems to have come in too low, too early to affect a large portion of the building. The section hit was the first of five sections to undergo renovations that would help protect the Pentagon from terrorist attacks. Recently completed straightening and blastproofing saved untold lives.
American Airlines Flight 77 could have carried up to 289 people, yet only 64 were aboard.
American Airlines Flight 11 could have had up to 351
people aboard, but only carried 92.
United Airlines Flight 175 was 81 percent empty.
United Airlines Flight 93 - 0ne of the most uplifting stories yet. The smallest flight to be hijacked with only 45 people aboard out of a possible 289 had 84 percent of its capacity unused. Yet these people stood up to the attackers, saving untold numbers of lives in the process.
In Summary - Out of potentially 74,280 Americans directly targeted, 93 percent survived or avoided the attacks. That's a higher survival rate than heart attacks, breast cancer, kidney transplants and liver transplants - all common, survivable illnesses. The terrorist attacks were all statistical failures.
Hardly a great comfort to those who lost loved ones, nonetheless,
a valuable lesson to the world. Pass this information on. Do not fear terrorists. The odds
are against them.
Author unknown, edited for this publication.
Have you received this in your email?
"I
don't know how computer literate these terrorists were but you all are not going to
believe this. Go to MS Word or Microsoft Works and do the following in this order. You
will be shocked at the result!!!
First open a blank sheet in MS Word or Microsoft Works. Next, type Q33NY. (This is the
flight that hit the World Trade Center). Now highlight the flight number and change the
font size to over 26. After completing that step, highlight again and change the flight
number font to "Wing Dings" or "Wing Dings 1."
Is this not incredible?!?!"
Yes, it
would be incredible (well, maybe), but read what the Urban
Legends Research Centre in Australia says about it
None of the four planes involved in the
terrorist attack on the US on September 11 2001 had a flight number of "Q33NY."
In fact, the planes were:
American Airlines Flight 11
American Airlines Flight 77
United Airlines Flight 93
United Airlines Flight 175
It's also worth mentioning that while the hoax flight
number contains the letters "NY," presumably suggesting the plane was destined
for New York, none of the planes actually involved in the attack were due to land at New
York. In fact, the planes were all heading to San Francisco and Los Angeles on the West
Coast.
Unfortunately, it's too easy to
imagine that this hoax was simply the product of someone playing with their word processor
until they identified what seemed like a meaningful series of characters and claimed they
constituted one of the flight numbers.
Save yourself the click. I made the point a few pages back, that numbers are at least are easy to manipulate as letters. The above appeared recently in Wilson's Almanac, edited for this publication.
The
Almanac is one of my daily reads always entertaining, now it's interesting to have the
Aussie view as well as personal thoughts from other countries. Free subscription: http://i.am/celebrations
or blank
email:
WilsonsAlmanac-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Another regular read is www.woogly.com. The following excerpt will give you an idea why,
"President
Saddam Hussein said the attacks were the result of aggressive U.S. policies and Americans
should feel and learn from the pain they had inflicted on other peoples, including Iraqis
and Palestinians. 'The American cowboys are reaping the fruit of their crimes against
humanity,' an official statement said.
"Shows how much he knows. American cowboys don't reap fruit." Aussie (That's her
name, not address.)
While I'm recommending, http://www.LadysZoo.com
comes from the Bronx three days a week. Both sites are completely unpredictable
content-wise, and definitely not for the kiddies.
Mike keeps telling me I'm having too much fun (such as it is) here. I am as a matter of fact. I love telling people where to go and how to get there. The one editor I ever got along with always said you either make money writing or you have fun. Please don't let that stop you from sending me a big fat ad for any ol' ad you'd like to see at the bottom of the page. Happy to oblige, under no obligation to "bow" to anyone's wishes.
One very smooth ad move I am pleased to report: Anheiser Busch has replaced something like 250 of their billboards with the flag. Dang, makes me wish I liked beer. Clever quip by newscaster, "This flag's for you!" Right on, worth a "Cheers."
I must have been saving up my cheerleading instincts - never was into sports or much of any type of rah rah - until now. I can't see too many flags, thumbs up, go get 'em, you bet. As soon as we got home, the printer was working overtime. We also had a "No signs to be displayed in windows" notice waiting.

Please do help yourself - these were a special request a while back - couldn't decide which one I liked best here :) Would be nice if you'd include a link when using, there will be more.
Bubba is an affectionate (most of the time anyway) term I use when referring to Mike on a number of subjects. You can take Bubba outta Texas, but ya can't take the Texas outta Bubba ... Y'all do know where our President grew up - the following may help you understand the mindset.
From a TexanSeptember 12, 2001
Dear Osama Bin Laden, Yasser Arafat, and Sadam Hussein, et. al.,
We are pleased to announce that we unequivocally accept your challenge to an old-fashioned game of whoop-ass. Now that we understand the rule that there are no rules, we look forward to playing by them for the first time. Since this game is a winner-take-all, we unfortunately are unable to invite you to join us at the victory celebration. But rest assured that we will toast you - LITERALLY.
While we will admit that you are off to an impressive lead, it is however now our turn at the plate. By the way, we will be playing on your court now. Batter up.
Sincerely,
The 270,000,000 citizens of the United States of America
A word advice to our soldiers, from Mike, "If there's a Texan in your unit, follow him - he won't give up.
Things a
True Southerner Knows
When somebody's "fixin'" to do something, it won't be long.
Texas is Mexican food like nowhere in the world, even Mexico. Texas is larger-than-life legends like Willie Nelson and Buddy Holly, Earl Campbell and Nolan Ryan, Denton Cooley and Michael DeBakey, Lyndon Johnson and George Bush.
Texas
is great companies like Dell Computer and Compaq. Texas is huge herds of cattle and miles
of crops. Texas is skies blackened with doves and leases full of deer. Texas is a place
where cities shut down for the Cowboys on Monday Night Football and the streets are
deserted during church. Texas is beaches and deserts, lakes and rivers, mountains and
prairies. If it isn't in Texas, you don't need it. No one does anything bigger or better.
By federal law, Texas is the only state in the U.S. that can fly its
flag at the same height as the U.S. flag. Think about that for a second. You fly the Stars
and Stripes at 20 feet in Maryland, or California, or Maine, and your state flag, whatever
the hell it is, goes at 17. You fly the Stars and Stripes in front of Pine Tree High in
Longview at 20 feet, the Lone Star flies at 20 feet.
Do you know why? Because we place being a Texan as high as being an
American down here. Our capitol is the only one in the country that is taller than the
capitol building in Washington, D. C. We signed those in as part of the deal when we came
on. That's the best part right there. WHEN WE CAME ON. Texas was its own country. The
Republic of Texas. Every time I think of that I tear up. All of that makes you proud to be
a Texan. Author unknown.
*Personal [Martha] note: One of my nieces went to Mirabeau B. Lamar grade school in Baytown. Lamar was the second president of the Republic of Texas. More impressive to me, from one of 328 entries in the Handbook of Texas Online, Lamar's proposal that the Congress establish a system of education endowed by public lands resulted in the act of January 26, 1839, which set aside land for public schools and two universities. Although it was decades before the school system was established, Lamar's advocacy of the program earned for him the nickname 'Father of Texas Education.'" So what? Lamar is one of Mike's great great granddaddies. From http://www.gltexas.org/lamar.html, "Lamar was commissioned a colonel and commanded the cavalry at the Battle of San Jacinto. He was soon appointed Secretary of War and demanded the execution of General Santa Anna as a murderer and war criminal. In September 1836 he was elected Vice-President of the Republic of Texas. In 1838 he was supported for President by the anti-Sam Houston faction. Both of his opponents' committed suicide before the election.
Another set of Mike's roots, several generations of Bradfields, also turn up searching the Handbook of Texas. The Bradfields were involved with newspaper publishing, education, and the first stage and railway lines.
A Bradfield and a Lamar married, then one of their children married a Vittrup who was part of the Danish immigration to Texas. Also from the TX handbook, "Initially, twenty families moved in, and others arrived before 1880. The group included Christian Moelbeck, a saddlemaker; Paul Paulsen, cabinetmaker; and Peter Jensen, blacksmith. The majority, the Sorensons, Rasmussens, Vittrups, and Olsens, were farmers."
Now, to Mike's credit and so nobody thinks I've changed allegiance to my own state ... "Bubba" has been duly impressed with the Missouri get-on-with-it, no BS attitude ever since we arrived. We (I'm from KC) are, after all, the Show-Me State.
There it is, even though I really didn't intend to go off on a background tangent. That's how it is around here, like it or not, it should help explain choice of page content.

Above I said I hadn't been involved in rah-rah - actually, by way of coincidence, I have taken full advantage of one somewhat unusual form of freedom of the press by acting as Miss Liberty's secretary.

The Mutt Extraordinaire, proudly wearing her colors in a fashion show
On the job, note press badge
For several years she had her own column in a Free Press publication and made numerous educational public appearances. I lost her to liver failure almost three years ago. I still maintain her site - the little beast always did get more mail than me. For the rest of the story and links, see Dog's Eye View, http://members.aol.com/Libbyk9/index.html

!0000 "fix" Urban
Legends Reference Pages: Inboxer Rebellion (Shark Account)
I fell for this one (it did make sense - yea right), tried it on one screen name's address
book. A week or so later, book won't open. Haven't had time to investigate but with aol
who knows. A few days ago I was also getting can't open messages on other names but that
only lasted a few hours - again, aol??? Would be interested to know if that's happened to
anyone else, and if there's a way to "unfix" - no idea how to get to book to
remove the !0000.
I'm seeing the "fix" pop up more and more from a variety of sources - might want
to pass along the link.
One more time, because this can not
be stressed often enough - visit the Rumors of War page at Snopes(the Urban Legends site)
before you pass along to your friends any of the many hoaxes and such arising from the
WTC/Pentagon disasters. http://www.snopes.com/rumors/rumors.htm
| The Hoax That Cried Virus | ||||||||||||||||
| Gullible users turn hoaxes into manually-driven worms | ||||||||||||||||
Computer virus hoaxes have been around for nearly as long as the first virus. Just after the 1988 introduction of the infamous Morris Internet worm, the first hoax began circulating. One might even consider hoaxes to be a cottage industry for the virus writers. Indeed, hoaxes, with their ominous warnings or fictitious promises of instant wealth, often seem far more believable to users than do legitimate warnings of actual threats. This in itself is disturbing, as once burned by a hoax many choose to disregard valid alerts as well. Hoaxes are arguably nothing more than a manually-driven email worm. By definition, a worm is a piece of malicious code that copies itself over and over again, either on the users system or, in modern times, by spreading itself through email. While the real worm relies on sophisticated coding to achieve spread, the craftily worded hoax simply relies on the user to do its dirty deed. As a result, a hoax can spread around the Internet in hours, clogging inboxes, saturating mail servers, and frustrating administrators who are charged with debunking these erroneous messages. The fact is, hoaxes have only one purpose in life and that is to spread to as many people as possible. Quite the same goal as most viruses, in fact. What many dont realize is that just as viruses cost recipients, so do hoaxes. Case in point: should a well-meaning network administrator believe a particular hoax is true and shutdown the mail servers as a precaution the resulting loss of productivity will be just as high as if a real virus attack had occurred. Hoaxbusters, formerly dedicated to eradicating the misconceptions regarding hoaxes and urban myths, takes another stance. They have determined the actual people hours involved with reading and forwarding just such erroneous information and prepared an eye-opening report on the high cost of believing. In the report, Hoaxbusters astutely points out that "if everyone on the Internet were to receive one hoax message and spend one minute reading and discarding it, the cost: would be something like: 50,000,000 people * 1/60 hour * $50/hour = $41.7 million". Hoaxbusters provocative look at the problem delves not only into the people-hour cost, but also into the toll taken on mail servers and network bandwidth. Indeed, after reading such an essay, it is easy to see that hoaxes are far from benign. The second problem hoaxes deliver is complacency. An individual, already embarrassed once for naively believing in a hoax, is much less likely to accept a valid virus warning as being true. Thus, a valid warning is met with disbelief and apathy. In such a case, a hoax can be considered a potential precursor to disaster. With the inherent negativity of a hoax already established, what should we do when a hoax message is received? Do we succumb to potentially misguided helpfulness and forward it on as suggested? Many fall into the "just-in-case" trap. They forward the email to everyone in their address book, despite their misgivings or doubt, just in case it might be true. As seen in the calculations above, this "just-in-case" forwarding is damaging. So what should we do?
If you still need further reason to refrain from forwarding these fakes, consider this: hoax forwarding is the trademark behavior of a new and inexperienced computer user. Is that really how you want to be perceived by your friends and colleagues? And, finally, neither Bill Gates, nor Outback Steakhouse, nor anyone else is going to give you money for forwarding emails. This most definitely falls in the realm of "too good to be true". |
||||||||||||||||
Please help yourself to the graphic - find out
how many of your friends look alike :) Mine all wanted to know where I got their pic!

MsAtte2ude@aol.com or AltMartha@aol.com

Martha Jones, 11469 Olive Blvd. #236, St. Louis, MO 63141
